Search This Blog

The Editor Saudi Gazette on the mass shootings in Paris and California:"I will not apologize." How should Muslims respond?



The Editor Saudi Gazette on the Mass Shootings in Paris and California:
"I will not Apologize." 
How should Muslims Respond?

Editor-at-large of The Saudi Gazete has to be a very well informed and knowledgable person. I respect that. But my Deen and my education has encouraged independent thinking. Hence I beg to differ from his excellent write up “I will not apologise” in response to the mass shootings in Paris and California.(A copy enclosed hereunder) I immediately agree. You do not have to apologise; certainly not. I do not have to, either. He does not have to. She does not have to. No Muslim has to because, as the writer has stated these episodes have nothing to do with Islam. And we do not need to prove this to anybody. Those who ask us for an apology are just being ridiculous. 

But we have a duty and an interest to condemn these dastardly attacks unconditionally. It is our duty as human being as these are attacks against humanity, duty as Americans because our fellow citizens are being brutally murdered by other fellow citizens and as Muslims because this carnage is conducted by terribly misguided Muslims as their distorted version of service of Islam.

The article does have a line to strongly condemn these atrocities: “I stand with the entire world in condemning the wanton, ruthless and mindless destruction of innocent human lives”. The rest of the editorial is devoted to bring out very nicely and forcefully a list of grievances that we have against “them” — the West. After affirming that he does not believe in conspiracies, the Editor states “…..but are mostly managed by shadowy groups operating under the umbrella of Western agencies.” The “Ummah” of our dreams is illiterate, week, fractious and therefore impotent in the world arena. We seem to have completely lost the capability of self analysis, self assessment. The usual stereotype of our reaction is something like this: we are OK; it is the vicious and cunning West that is responsible for all our misery and mishaps. Since we cannot match them the only two weapons we have in our armory are taking shelter in a state of denial or throwing the ball in the court of “the West or the Western agencies”. A majority of my fellow Muslims support and follow this line of thinking and approach in our political, social. and economic confrontations with the current dominant force, the West. Hence I will not discuss it further except pointing out that they are acting as members of the “Tribe of Muslims” and practicing the age old tribal values. The truth is that Ummah or Community of Faith should be bound by Spirituality and Spiritual values.

I will strongly suggest to deal with our current problem of mass shootings as Muslims who are members of the “Deen of Islam” and not the “Tribe of Muslims”. These are two distinct classes. Bernard Shaw had famously said that “Islam is the best religion but has the worst followers”. Near at home, the poet philosopher Dr. Mohammed Iqbal saw Islam in Europe but no Muslims; on returning home in India he saw many Muslims but could not find  Islam. As members of the former class “Deen of Islam” our approach on the problem under discussion will then have to deviate from the stereotype followed in this article. We will have to first select some of the golden principles of our Deen to guide us in this matter. First and foremost is Taqwaa —God consciousness. Yes, you read it right. This core value of Islam is the basic first step to keep us “on the right path” in real situations like the mass shooting we are discussing. Members of the “Tribe of Muslims” restrict this concept —taqwaa — to discussions in our lectures, da’waa, halaqua and conferences. Allah Ta’aala and HIS Messenger want it — taqwaa — to be manifested in our daily dealings on the ground. We must be fully conscious that what we feel, say and do about the Paris and San Bernardino massacre will be accountable on the Day of Judgement. This principle can never be overemphasized. As our Holy Book emphasizes an “iota” of “good or bad” done in our life in this world will be “seen” and accounted in the other world. Second principle, we must remind ourselves that the murder of a single human being is a murder of whole mankind. Third, Islam permits Qisas only on one to one basis; the guilty for the victim. Fourth fairness and justice is ordained to us even for our enemies. With these principles in mind, build up your response to these mass shootings. It appears it has to be an outright condemnation with out any ifs and buts. As a Muslim, I dare not relate in any way —correlate, explain, offer a basis, partly justify — these mass murders in Paris and California to the horrible and recurrent killings of my brothers and sisters in Palestine. I am afraid this attempt at relating the two can be labelled as a major sin, a gunahe kabeera as it runs counter to clear instructions of our Holy Text as outlined earlier. 

Copy of the article:

         SAUDI ARABIA




"Fear Ignorance, Not Muslims" says the Editorial Board of New York Times

"Fear Ignorance, Not Muslims" 
Says the Editorial Board of New York Times

“Fear Ignorance, Not Muslims” is the courageous declaration of the Editorial Board of the New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/opinion/fear-ignorance-not-muslims.html?emc=edit_th_20151205&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=64792905. It states among other things that “Americans must guard against overreaction, and subdue the panicked reflex of distrust and hatred toward the Americans among us who are Muslims” … …..today the ignorance is being inflamed by know-nothings in the political sphere ……….Chief Downing said law enforcement needs the trust and cooperation of the majority of Muslims in the mainstream………but murderous gun rampages, an everyday occurrence in the United States, have been set off by workplace resentments, anti-abortion and anti-government zealotry, paranoia, suicidal megalomania, various other forms of sociopathy, and by no evident reasons at all”. The Board concludes “There is nothing wise — particularly from a law-enforcement and security perspective — about the urge to isolate and stigmatize Americans of any faith or heritage.”

Apart from this bold editorial of the New York Times, other prominent leaders including our President and past Secretary Hilary Clinton have come out very forcefully and clearly to dissociate ISIS and its activities from Muslims and Islam. It is our duty now and in our interest to support these leaders by our words and deeds. 

We Muslims should respond responsibly and positively. Let us not go on the defensive mode after the San Bernardino massacre and shut ourselves into a state of denial ascribing whatever happened to the “CIA and the Zionist lobby”. I have already received an email from a group casting doubts about the tragic incident.

The first step is unqualified and unequivocal denunciation of ISIS following the lead of ISNA which has announced that “They are thugs and killers, part of a cult of death”. This should not be coupled with reference to Islamophobia or other genuine grievances that we have. This is not the occasion for it. Also it may sound as some sort of justification for the horrible atrocity.

Are we doing this? Does ISNA, quoted above represents the view of the consensus of Muslim Americans? I am afraid, I am not really sure. We Muslims have a long long list of genuine or perceived grievances against “them”, the “West” the “Americans”. It can be traced centuries back to the era of Western imperialism and colonialism. In our times it is primarily based on American Foreign Policy. As a Super Power, US has and will continue to come into conflict with many Muslim countries. We do not like it, rather hate it. The worst irritation to us is the persistent, unfair and blind support of US for the state of Israel to the detriment of the suffering of the beleaguered Palestinians. Here is the catch, though. We knew all this in our own countries before we decided to move over to US. Yet we were very keen and successful to come to this country, got educated here, got a job here with a successful comfortable life, grew up our children in healthy, liberal atmosphere with quality education. Applied and got citizenship of this country; took oath to be loyal to the Flag and the Constitution. The consequence is very natural. A dichotomy in our personality; a state of love and hate with our new country and identity. I am afraid this is responsible for a sense of inner and suppressed antipathy and animosity against “them, the West, US” in favour of the “Ummah”. So much so that many many of us have some sort of sympathy even for bodies like ISIS who bring nothing but disgrace and shame to our beautiful religion. Time and again, in discussions and articles “islamophobia” and the American behavior with Muslims in some part of the world is referred to when discussing the Paris or California attack. The underlying message is to dilute/explain/correlate/diminish/partly justify the horrors committed by ISIS. 
Our competition and confrontation with the people of the Book started right at the birth of Islam. Initially we had the upper hand. We were powerful. We spread out, conquered and built a formidable empire. Intellectual stagnation followed. We were vanquished and governed. Since then the relationship between the two peoples has elements — slight, strong sometimes, very strong occasionally —- of fear and hate i.e. “phobia” for each other. Hence the talk of a “clash of civilizations”. I grew up listening to our Maulvis refer to the West as kuffars. It is a very wide spread belief amongst us that we cannot be friendly and social with the Christians and Jews based on very wrong interpretations of some ayahs of our Holy Text. However, the Holy Quran clearly and strictly orders us to be Fair and Just even to our enemies. Since it is a Devine injunction, it will be haram for a Muslim not to do so; not to be fair and just in all  his/her dealings. I therefore suggest that the “Islamophobia” most of us often refer to is in fact a reciprocal phobia among the three cousins of the Abrahamic Faith. 

However there is a great surge in this sentiment of phobia since the turn of the twenty first century. I would like to call it “Muslimophobia”. This is a new phenomena and a reaction to entirely new circumstances and therefore needs and entirely different type of approach from the age old “Islamophobia”. Terrorism is known for centuries in human history. However 9/11 gave it entirely different dimensions. Al Qaeda made it global and effective (This brings in another problem; many Muslims have reasons to refuse this story of Al Qaeda etc. We will deal with this issue at some other time. Bear with me in the meantime). Now ISIS has taken it to perfection. Its methods proved be too cruel and gruesome even for Al Qaeda. It is the first time that a terrorist organization has a significant territory under its control. It has succeeded in reaching the minds and hearts of individuals by its mastery of modern technology — social media, video messages, attractive and instructive websites — and unabashed brutality and barbarity. The lasting psychological and emotional impact on lots and lots of people, Europeans and Americans of all Faiths cannot be over emphasized. More importantly, ISIS has gone out of the way to bring out and emphasize that this is an Islamic movement and aims at restoring the glory of past Islam. It has usurped the label of Caliphate, has a self styled Leader of the Faithful, has our Shahada on its black flag and embarks on their nefarious actions with our most inspiring slogan of Allah-o-Akbar. It is quite natural therefore that ISIS has produced a lot of fear and hate i.e. phobia in Europe and America against the Western Muslims in their midst. Just as we do not want the non-Muslims to implicate Islam and all Muslims in the activities of ISIS, we should not think it is Islam when they, Europeans and Americans express fear and hate as a result of  the activities of ISIS. Hence the highly intensified and vocalized phobia of the twenty first century against the Muslims in Europe and US is a fear of Muslim fellow citizens triggered by ISIS — a Muslimophobia. It is not a continuation of the mutual phobia that the the three Abrahamic faiths have been displaying with one another over the centuries. I feel this is a very important differentiation. Only on realizing this distinction, we can condemn ISIS completely and wholeheartedly without referring to our previous differences and grievances. 

Our Deen is a very balanced religion and demands a strict sense of proportion from its followers. Are we matching up to the standards expected by Islam in the problem under discussion. Let us see, if the action and the reaction are commensurate?  Compare the intensity and magnitude of the activities of the ISIS with the attitude of Americans and Europeans against us; the massacre of fourteen innocent lives and wounding of twenty one in a holiday party by their peer of five years against the shooting through the Quran, sneers and sarcasm, threatening calls and vandalizing mosques by the Americans. Secondly, h ave we noted the very clear rejection of this negative reaction by the leadership of the country, almost across the board. To clarify my point, let us change the playing field: killing of Muslims by non-Muslims in a Muslim majority country. Can you imagine the reaction if a single Muslim is killed by a non-Muslim under these circumstances? If you have any doubts let me give you an example. It is Malaysia, a moderate Muslim majority country. Christians are a minority but form forty per cent of the population. A few years ago, the Muslims objected to the use of the word “Allah” in Churches and demanded that the practice be stopped henceforth. By the way from the Islamic point of view it is a totally un-Islamic demand. The word Allah was used by pagans of Arabia much before the advent of Islam. Moreover our Holy Text clearly states to the un-believers that it is no use quibbling over the word Allah for HE is our God and your God. Anyhow this is not the only occasion when Muslims of our age act against the clear dictates of the Holy Quran. To continue the story, the government of the time supported the demand. Christians had to give in. But they appealed to the Supreme Court. After two years of deliberations, the Court delivered a decision upholding the right of Christians to use the word of Allah in their Churches. This was the action, perfectly justified and democratic, you will agree. Now note the reaction of Muslims in a Muslim majority country against a minority of forty per cent. Next day there were bomb attacks in six churches. Any action against the miscreants? None. Any condemnation by any leader or Muslim scholar? None reported in the source I have read.  Here is the master stroke. The Prime Minister of the time is on record, when interviewed on TV (I heard the recording) trivializing the rampage as  “….these are emotional issues”!

A couple of related issues need discussion. Insha Allah at a later date.




A Thought for Today




Islam, Pure and Peaceful needs no defense. ISIS, the "psychopathic monster" needs to be condemned: unqualified, with words followed by deeds. Especially by us Muslims. Why we? Because they parade under a black banner with our most sacred Shahada on it and they charge into their grisly and gruesome murders with our most thrilling and elevating slogan "Allah-o-Akbar". Disgraceful to us and our beautiful Deen.    

Secretary John Kerry thinks our Democracy bothers ISIS, a “psychopathic monster” Right? Wrong?


Secretary John Kerry thinks our Democracy Bothers ISIS
A “psychopathic monster” 
Right? Wrong?

I agree that ISIS is a “psychopathic monster” as you have stated Secretary John Kerry. But this is not because they are against our Democratic values. On the contrary they are capitalizing on the lapses of these values that we betray from time to time. Yes, it is an inhuman and barbaric body. Notwithstanding what follows, I am sure they need to be eliminated. They are against everybody excepting themselves and those who agree with them. This is entirely because of their perverse mind and draconian and maniacal policies. As I have said earlier It is not that our our Democratic values bother them. Probably they love them because it makes their heinous task easier. They have got their ammunition from events when the West has  digressed from these democratic values. It starts centuries in the past with the Imperial and Colonial history of Great Britain and Europe. This was obviously no democracy. It resulted in a lasting scar on the psyche of many nations. It is also responsible for the presence of millions of people from the “slave” nations in the “master” countries today. At the end of the first World War the division of the Middle East among the victors was everything but democratic. It is directly and positively responsible for the utter chaos and mind boggling confusion in that area. And ISIS is one of its off shoots. At the end of second World War there was a successful attempt to carve out a new country for seventeen million people of an Abrahamic Faith. There are perhaps many justifications for this action but democracy is certainly not one of them. At the conception of this movement at the turn of twentieth century, there were merely two percent folks of this Faith in Palestine. It was artificially, forcefully, systematically and diligently but anti-democratically pumped up since then Religion is taboo in the politics of the Western World as a function of democracy.  But they supported the creation of a state on strictly religious grounds on the basis of a claim in the Holy Scriptures of seventeen million people of a certain Faith and ignored the Holy Book of about one and half billion people of another Abrahamic Faith. This is any thing but democratic. The new state is now an occupation power. There is no attempt by the Western media and governments to ensure democratic rights for the original people of the land. The government of the country is using all the methods of an imperial power witnessed over the centuries to manage their subjects. To this day, they continue to forcefully grab more territory in the occupied land in open defiance of even their greatest benefactor and protector, USA. The international community, who is responsible for its creation in the first place has given them a free hand. Is this democracy or the lack of it? Our country, US is very conspicuous by ignoring basic democratic values in its relations with the new state. The classical example was the invitation to the Prime Minister to address the Congress in defiance of core democratic protocol. The repeated standing ovations that he got from the members of our esteemed congress reminded me of the huge crowd in the streets of Karachi similarly cheering their leader Altaf Hussein who was calling from London. I could not believe my eyes; it was demeaning, not democratic. In the nuclear field we have one standard for six million people of one Country/Faith and another for seventy eight million of another Country/Faith. In the former case there seems to be an international conspiracy “Hush, do not talk!”; in the latter case aggressive diplomatic efforts to successfully stop it. Do you call this democracy? To stop one from a nuclear dash is very right and laudable. To remain silent for the other is not democratic but unjust and unfair. In short, I totally agree with your assessment, definition and remedy for ISIS. The only point of difference: it is not our democracy but the frequent abandoning of our democratic values that has given the vicious and barbaric minds of ISIS fuel and energy. Cannot conclude without asserting that this is no attempt to suggest even an iota of justification for the depraved, disgusting and barbarians like ISIS.

QURANIC DIRECTIVES FOR MUSLIMS AGAINST SOME COMMON SOCIAL EVILS

November 18, 2015


 Read ONLY,  IF AND WHEN you have time and mood for: 
 “An Ayah of the Quran for 30 Days” -- November 2015

Choose the section you have time, in the next 30 days to read this ayah:-

Prelude:                       Recurrent Primary Message          1st.          Page
Starting Dua, a note & The Ayah                                      2nd.        Page
A Short Summary:       For the Busy Bee                            Two        Pages
The Main Story:           Recommended                               Three  +  Pages
Footnotes:                   For the Perfectionist                        One        Pages


PRELUDE
From the Pen and Perspective of a self-styled PPK Muslim (Proud, Practicing, Knowledgeable) with a humble submission that Islam totally rejects Blind Following BUT vigorously focusses on the Limitations of Pure Human Reasoning..............and clearly and comprehensively AlLAH knows best.

In the beginning of the seventh century C.E., the folks of Mecca and Medina had a fascinatingly unique window: they had direct access to the Heavens through one of their own. They were blessed with a regular stream of Divine counseling and guidelines. Question and answer sessions were part of the program. Even individual questioner was graced by an answer. In the short Introduction to this scheme they were assured that at the end of this twenty-two year project, Divine Directions and Admonitions will continue through the agency of the PEN. The whole discourse has been preserved and archived till eternity under the guarantee of our Lord and Creator. This record in known as the Quran. 

It should sound unbelievable but factually appears to be true: Many of our prevalent, widespread and important concepts and opinions about religious matters do not have a basis in the Quran and sometimes even appear to be in obvious conflict with the teachings of the Quran. It would be very educative and helpful to discuss an Ayah once a month to see if it supports or rejects our views and actions in our daily life. I wish and hope this email generates a fruitful interactive discussion. 

بِسمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحمٰنِ الرَّحيمِ


In the name of Allah, we praise HIM, seek HIS help and ask for HIS forgiveness. Whosoever Allah guideth none can misguide; whosoever HE allows to fall astray, none can guide him right. We bear witness that there is none worthy of worship but Allah alone and we bear witness that Mohammed, SAW is HIS slave-servant and the Seal of HIS Messengers. 
Further, we recall that Allah Ta’aala has declared in HIS Book1 “He granteth wisdom to whom He pleaseth; and he to whom wisdom is granted receiveth indeed a benefit overflowing; but none will grasp the Message (or remember or receive admonition) but men of understanding (or intellect)” and we also recall that he has warned us about the day of judgement2 “Then on that day you shall most certainly be questioned about the boons (joy, pleasure).” We realise, that there cannot be a greater boon or blessing or benefit than wisdom and we wonder if this should be a timely reminder to very many of us sincere and practicing Muslims who use our critical thinking to enhance the mundane for ourselves and our families but resort to compulsory following -- taqleed, doctrine of classical Sunni Islamic Fiqh  -- in matters religion. 

(NOTE:  I have filtered out the proofs and details into the Footnotes for those who have the time and interest for them. The main email will then be reasonable length, hopefully for the busy majority. What follows is not a sermon; I do not feel qualified to give one, anyhow. I wish, it may provide a food for thought. A caveat seems in order: If the ayah selected pertains to issues we face in our daily life with our family, friends, neighbours or peers it may affect us personally and lead to some self analysis and soul searching which in turn could be divisive and distressing. If taken in the right spirit, it can be a humble attempt towards finding the “straight path”.) 

THE AYAH
Surah AL-ḤUJURĀT 49, Ayah 12
يا أَيُّهَا الَّذينَ آمَنُوا اجتَنِبوا كَثيرًا مِنَ الظَّنِّ إِنَّ بَعضَ الظَّنِّ إِثمٌ ۖ وَلا تَجَسَّسوا وَلا يَغتَب بَعضُكُم بَعضًا ۚ أَيُحِبُّ أَحَدُكُم أَن يَأكُلَ لَحمَ أَخيهِ مَيتًا فَكَرِهتُموهُ ۚ وَاتَّقُوا اللَّهَ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ تَوّابٌ رَحيمٌ

“O you who have believed, avoid much [negative] assumption. Indeed, some assumption is sin. And do not spy or backbite each other. Would one of you like to eat the flesh of his brother when dead? You would detest it. And fear Allah ; indeed, Allah is Accepting of repentance and Merciful.”

ABSTRACT
The ayah under discussion follows the ayah we discussed last month and continues the same theme:
Proclaiming Divine directives — the ahkaamaat — to help us to live our religion (as against just talk about it) on the ground. Allah Ta’aala Subhaanahoo decrees on three moral frailties conjecture, spying and backbiting in this ayah:
 “O you who have believed, avoid much [negative] assumption. Indeed, some assumption is sin. And do not spy or backbite each other. Would one of you like to eat the flesh of his brother when dead? You would detest it. And fear Allah ; indeed, Allah is Accepting of repentance and Merciful.” 

The article elaborates on these three vices and brings out their actual meaning and the implications in our daily life. What to avoid and how to do it? Several ahaadith are quoted to bring out the clarifications and elucidation of our Beloved Prophet on these three evil practices. His definition of these terms is highlighted.
Before concluding, the ayah as usual warns of the only sanction behind all the ahkaamaat (directives) of our Deity viz. “wat takul lah”  usually translated as “ and fear Allah”. This is the literal meaning of the           Arabic words but does not seem to fully encompass the Quranic concept and image of our Lord Creator. I prefer some of the other translations offered: “And be pious to Allah” (Dr. Ghali), “And keep your duty to Allah” (Pickthall) and “be careful of (your duty to) Allah” (Shakir). God consciousness seems to be the best rendering of the Arabic word taqwaa. If one is alive to and aware of HIS PRESENCE, all the ahkaamaat of the Quran get the first and foremost priority at every breadth one takes. However forget this FUNDAMENTAL REALITY and they — the  ahkaamaat - are reduced to mere recorded words in the Quran. 
The ayah concludes with the oft-repeated reassurance through out the Holy Text to the sin-prone humanity that Allah Ta’aala Subhanahoo quickly Accepts Repentance and is Ever-Merciful. This indeed is the main hope for our salvation at the Final Reckoning.        


A SHORT VERSION
“I am convinced about the veracity of my opinions, but I do consider it likely that they may turn out to be incorrect. Likewise, I am convinced about the incorrectness of the views different from mine, but I do concede the possibility that they may turn out to be correct.” Imam Shafa’i

This ayah follows the ayah we discussed last month and continues the same theme: Proclaiming Divine directives — the ahkaamaat — to help us to live our religion (as against just talk about it) on the ground. It is discussing three different actions and attitudes which all of us encounter through out our life. 

To start with we are asked to “ijtaneboo” i.e. avoid to0 much of “zan” because some “zan” is sinful. Watch the gradations. We are asked to avoid excess of “zan”  because some of “zan” is sinful. It has not been made outright unlawful; there is a conditional restriction. Allow me to quote Maulana Maudoodi to explain the rationale for this differentiation  “conjecture by itself is not anything forbidden; rather in some cases and situations it is commendable, in some situations inevitable, in some permissible up to a certain extent and un-permissible beyond it, and in some cases absolutely unlawful.” ……..(see the main story)
Let us first define the meaning of the Arabic word “zan”. 
In the lexicon “zan”  means assumption. Various mufassirs have rendered it as “much surmise; negative assumption; most guesswork”. During explanation, Maudoodi calls it conjecture. In short, any opinion, judgement or reasoning based on incomplete or inconclusive evidence can be called  “zan”. 

As we have noted that “zan” is not proscribed generally but only when in excess and only “some” of it is characterized as sinful indicating that there are different types of them. Let us discuss some of them. ……..
There are several well-authenticated sayings of our Holy Prophet on this subject: 

"Beware of all guesswork [about one another], for, behold, all [such] guesswork is most deceptive; and do not spy upon one another, and do not try to bare [other people's] failings" (Muwatta) ……………

“Do not spy” is the next decree; as important as it is common causing painful and distressing social problems. It appears almost as part of human nature to prod on others: relatives, friends, neighbours, peers etc. What are they doing, why are they doing, what is their income, where all the wealth comes from,  how are their matrimonial relations, how can they afford a new car so often etc etc. Any defect or weakness in an individual becomes a hot topic to gossip about though this should not be our concern. Interest in “others” is usually one of the main topics at social gatherings. “This also includes reading other people's private letters, listening secretly to private conversation, peeping into the neighbor's house, and trying to get information in different ways about the domestic life or private affairs of others” adds Maulana Maudoodi. Allah Ta’aala Subhanahoo clearly forbids all such talks whatever the reason or purpose behind it. 

Our Holy Prophet has elaborated on this principle on many occasions:
"O people, who have professed belief verbally, but faith has not yet entered your hearts: Do not pry into the affairs of the Muslims, for he who will pry into the affairs of the Muslims, Allah will pry into his affairs, and he whom AIlah follows inquisitively, is disgraced by Him in his own house. " (Abu Da'ud). ………

Our Shari’ah does not allow even an Islamic Government to spy the personal activities of individuals to dig out their sins and errors and then go ahead to punish them. The government comes into action only when there are any public consequences. The moral duty of the government to enforce the Shari’ah does not give it a right to private spying according to Islamic scholarship. This is well illustrated by the behaviour of the second Caliph Sayyidna Umar:  ……           (see the main story)
This principle is supported by a saying of our Holy Prophet: “When the ruler starts searching for the causes of suspicions among the people he corrupts them" (Abu Da'ud). 

Finally, in the ayah Muslims are forbidden to backbite i.e. speak evil of a person at his back; some thing that will hurt him if he comes to know about. It is backbiting if the person does have the negative quality referred to. If he does not have it then the crime is worst; it is a calumny and vilification. 

Praising somebody in his absence is allowed and even encouraged. A verse in the Quran emphasizes to us to have good thoughts about the believers:3 

“Why do not the believing men and women, whenever such [a rumour] is heard, think the best of one another and say, "This is an obvious falsehood”?  Mohammed Asad

But a note of caution is valid and required hear. Without labelling everybody as a thief, we have to be careful and pragmatic before trusting and entrusting others; we need to know about them and have to enquire about them.

Our holy Prophet himself has defined ghibat for us on several occasions:  …………….
It should be noticed however that backbiting will remain a sin even if the person talked about is not aware of it. Talking evil of a person after death is also backbiting; I personally think it is a worst form of it.
The weight and gravity of this evil habit is emphasised when the Quran equates it to eating the flesh of your dead brother. Nothing can be more dreadful and disgusting. Is it an exaggeration to say that, despite such forceful prohibition in our Text this practice is fairly common if not very common among us  Muslims?

Is backbiting, a horrible act like eating a dead brother’s flesh ever permissible. Indeed it is. After all, ours is a natural religion. All of us have felt the need to talk about somebody in his/her absence. I have been warned by my wife, at times “hey, this is ghibat”. I am sure some of you also must have had this experience. A rule laid down by our Jurists and Ulema defines the limits of this option: 
Ghibat (backbiting) is permissible only in case it is needed for a real and genuine (genuine from the Shari'ah point of view) necessity and the necessity may not be satisfied without having resort to it”. Based on this principle, our scholars have listed the circumstances in which ghibat is permissible: ……….

On realisation, a backbiter should ask for forgiveness from his Creator and vow to HIM never to do it again. He should also refute his false allegations. If the object of his accusation has learnt about it then his pardon is absolutely essential. However if the victim is unaware of it, he is better left alone.

Before concluding, the ayah as usual warns of the only sanction behind all the ahkaamaat (directives) of our Deity viz. “wat takul lah”  usually translated as “ and fear Allah”. This is the literal meaning of the Arabic words but does not seem to fully encompass the Quranic concept and image of our Lord Creator. I prefer some of the other translations offered: “And be pious to Allah” (Dr. Ghali), “And keep your duty to Allah” (Pickthall) and “be careful of (your duty to) Allah” (Shakir). God consciousness seems to be the best rendering of the Arabic word taqwaa. If one is alive to and aware of HIS PRESENCE, all the ahkaamaat of the Quran get the first and foremost priority at every breadth one takes. However forget this FUNDAMENTAL REALITY and they — the  ahkaamaat - are reduced to mere recorded words in the Quran. 

The ayah concludes with the oft-repeated reassurance through out the Holy Text to the sin-prone humanity that Allah Ta’aala Subhanahoo quickly Accepts Repentance and is Ever-Merciful. This indeed is the main hope for our salvation at the Final Reckoning.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

........and Allah knows best. 
May Allah Ta’aala bless us with true understanding--“fahm”--of our Deen, Aameen.

THE MAIN STORY
“I am convinced about the veracity of my opinions, but I do consider it likely that they may turn out to be incorrect. Likewise, I am convinced about the incorrectness of the views different from mine, but I do concede the possibility that they may turn out to be correct.” Imam Shafa’i

This ayah follows the ayah we discussed last month and continues the same theme: Proclaiming Divine directives — the ahkaamaat — to help us to live our religion (as against just talk about it) on the ground. It is discussing three different actions and attitudes which all of us encounter through out our life. 

To start with we are asked to “ijtaneboo” i.e. avoid to0 much of “zan” because some “zan” is sinful. Watch the gradations. We are asked to avoid excess of “zan”  because some of “zan” is sinful. It has not been made outright unlawful; there is a conditional restriction. Allow me to quote Maulana Maudoodi to explain the rationale for this differentiation  “conjecture by itself is not anything forbidden; rather in some cases and situations it is commendable, in some situations inevitable, in some permissible up to a certain
extent and un-permissible beyond it, and in some cases absolutely unlawful.” Imam Abii Bakr Jassas in Ahkaam-ul-Qur’an divides “zan”   into four categories: 
[I] prohibited
[2] imperative 
[3] recommended and desirable 
[4] permissible.
 Let us first define the meaning of the Arabic word “zan”. 

In the lexicon “zan”  means assumption. Various mufassirs have rendered it as “much surmise; negative assumption; most guesswork”. During explanation, Maudoodi calls it conjecture. In short, any opinion, judgement or reasoning based on incomplete or inconclusive evidence can be called  “zan”. 

As we have noted that “zan” is not proscribed generally but only when in excess and only “some” of it is characterized as sinful indicating that there are different types of them. Let us discuss some of them. Forming a good opinion of somebody even on inadequate evidence is fair, even encouraged. 
In certain situations opinions have to be formed on the best evidence available — no absolute and clear-cut proof — and this is permissible. This is termed as “Az-zan-ul-ghalib”  in Islamic jurisprudence and is the prevailing practice in the law-courts. 
If there is some evidence to question the character and dealings of an individual, it will be sinful to blame him as such. But it will be desirable to take any precautionary measures if required on the basis of that suspicion. As Mufti Mohammed Shafi puts it “…..However, if there is an apprehension that some member of the Muslim community may be harmed by some mischief-makers, it is permitted for others to spy to protect the innocent and peaceful people, and search furtively for the intentions and conspiracies of such people who are a danger to the society. 
Criticizing a person on inadequate grounds is not acceptable. 
Maligning or sanctioning somebody on inadequate evidence is sinful. 
It is equally sinful if an individual is suspected when the evidence is equal between his favour and against him.

There are several well-authenticated sayings of our Holy Prophet on this subject: 

"Beware of all guesswork [about one another], for, behold, all [such] guesswork is most deceptive; and do not spy upon one another, and do not try to bare [other people's] failings" (Muwatta)

"Do not hurt those who have surrendered themselves to God (al-muslimin), and do not impute evil to them, and do not try to uncover their nakedness [i.e., their faults]: for, behold, if anyone tries to uncover his brother's nakedness, God will uncover his own nakedness [on the Day of Judgment]" (Tirimidhi)

 "Never does a believer draw a veil over the nakedness of another believer without God's drawing a veil over his own nakedness on Resurrection Day" (Bukhari).

“Do not spy” is the next decree; as important as it is common causing painful and distressing social problems. It appears almost as part of human nature to prod on others: relatives, friends, neighbours, peers etc. What are they doing, why are they doing, what is their income, where all the wealth comes from,  how are their matrimonial relations, how can they afford a new car so often etc etc. Any defect or weakness in an individual becomes a hot topic to gossip about though this should not be our concern. Interest in “others” is usually one of the main topics at social gatherings. “This also includes reading other people's private letters, listening secretly to private conversation, peeping into the neighbor's house, and trying to get information in different ways about the domestic life or private affairs of others” adds Maulana Maudoodi. Allah Ta’aala Subhanahoo clearly forbids all such talks whatever the reason or purpose behind it. 

Our Holy Prophet has elaborated on this principle on many occasions:
"O people, who have professed belief verbally, but faith has not yet entered your hearts: Do not pry into the affairs of the Muslims, for he who will pry into the affairs of the Muslims, Allah will pry into his affairs, and he whom AIlah follows inquisitively, is disgraced by Him in his own house. " (Abu Da'ud). 

Hadrat Mu'awiyah says that he himself heard the Holy Prophet say; `If you start prying into the secret affairs of the people, you will corrupt them, or at least drive them very near corruption. " (Abu Da'ud). 

In another Hadith he said: "When you happen to form an evil opinion about somebody, do not pry about it. " (AI-Jassas, Ahkaam al-Qur'an). 

According to still another Hadith, the Holy Prophet said: "The one who saw a secret affair of somebody and then concealed it, is as though he saved a girl who had been buried alive." (AI-Jassas). 

Our Shari’ah does not allow even an Islamic Government to spy the personal activities of individuals to dig out their sins and errors and then go ahead to punish them. The government comes into action only when there are any public consequences. The moral duty of the government to enforce the Shari’ah does not give it a right to private spying according to Islamic scholarship. This is well illustrated by the behaviour of the second Caliph Sayyidna Umar:
Once at night he heard the voice of a person who was singing in his house. He became curious and climbed the wall. There he saw wine as well as a woman present. He shouted at the man, saying: "O enemy of God, do you think you will disobey Allah, and Allah will not expose your secret?" The man replied: °Do not make haste, O Commander of the Faithful: if I have committed one sin, you have committed three sins: Allah has forbidden spying, and you have spied; AIlah has commanded that one should enter the houses by the doors, and you have entered it by climbing over the wall; Allah has commanded that one should avoid entering the other people's houses without permission, and you have entered my house without my permission. " Hearing this reply Sayyidna Umar confessed his error, and did not take any action against the man, but made him to promise that he would follow the right way in future. (Abi Bakr Muhammad bin Ja`far al-Khara'iti, Makarim al-Akhlaq).  

This principle is supported by a saying of our Holy Prophet: “When the ruler starts searching for the causes of suspicions among the people he corrupts them" (Abu Da'ud). 

Finally, in the ayah Muslims are forbidden to backbite i.e. speak evil of a person at his back; some thing that will hurt him if he comes to know about. It is backbiting if the person does have the negative quality referred to. If he does not have it then the crime is worst; it is a calumny and vilification. 

Praising somebody in his absence is allowed and even encouraged. A verse in the Quran emphasizes to us to have good thoughts about the believers:3 

“Why do not the believing men and women, whenever such [a rumour] is heard, think the best of one another and say, "This is an obvious falsehood”?  Mohammed Asad

But a note of caution is valid and required hear. Without labelling everybody as a thief, we have to be careful and pragmatic before trusting and entrusting others; we need to know about them and have to enquire about them.

Our holy Prophet himself has defined ghibat for us on several occasions: 
“It is talking of your brother in a way irksome to him." It was asked: “What, if the defect being talked of is present in my brother?" The Holy Prophet replied: "If it is present in him, it would be ghibat; if it is not there, it would be slandering him. " 

 "A person asked the Holy Prophet: What is ghibat? The Holy Prophet replied: It is talking of your brother in a way irksome to him. He asked: Even if it is true, O Messenger of Allah? He replied: If what you said was false, it would then be a calumny."  Mu'watta, on the authority of Hadrat Muttalib bin Abdullah

It should be noticed however that backbiting will remain a sin even if the person talked about is not aware of it. Talking evil of a person after death is also backbiting; I personally think it is a worst form of it.
The weight and gravity of this evil habit is emphasised when the Quran equates it to eating the flesh of your dead brother. Nothing can be more dreadful and disgusting. Is it an exaggeration to say that, despite such forceful prohibition in our Text this practice is fairly common if not very common among us  Muslims?

Is backbiting, a horrible act like eating a dead brother’s flesh ever permissible. Indeed it is. After all, ours is a natural religion. All of us have felt the need to talk about somebody in his/her absence. I have been warned by my wife, at times “hey, this is ghibat”. I am sure some of you also must have had this experience. A rule laid down by our Jurists and Ulema defines the limits of this option: 
Ghibat (backbiting) is permissible only in case it is needed for a real and genuine (genuine from the Shari'ah point of view) necessity and the necessity may not be satisfied without having resort to it”. Based on this principle, our scholars have listed the circumstances in which ghibat is permissible:
(1) Complaining by an oppressed person against the oppressor before every such person who he thinks            can do something to save him from the injustice. 
(2) To make mention of the evils of a person (or persons) with the intention of reform before those who can do expected to help remove the evils. 
(3) To state the facts of a case before a legal expert for the purpose of seeking a religious or legal ruling regarding an unlawful act committed by a person. 
(4) To warn the people of the mischiefs of a person (or persons) so that they may ward off the evil, e g. it is not only permissible but obligatory to mention the weaknesses of the reporters, witnesses and writers, for without it, it is not possible to safeguard the Shari ah against the propagation of false reports, the courts against injustices and the common people or the students against errors and misunderstandings. Or, for instance, if a person wants to have the relationship of marriage with somebody, or wishes to rent a house in the neighborhood of somebody, or wants to give something into the custody of somebody, and consults another person, it is obligatory for him to apprise him of aII aspects so that he is not deceived because of ignorance. 
(5) To raise voice against and criticise the evils of the people who may be spreading sin and immorality and error, or corrupting the people's faith and persecuting them. 
(6) To use nicknames for the people who may have become well known by those names, but this should be done for the purpose of their recognition and not with a view to condemn them. 

On realisation, a backbiter should ask for forgiveness from his Creator and vow to HIM never to do it again. He should also refute his false allegations. If the object of his accusation has learnt about it then his pardon is absolutely essential. However if the victim is unaware of it, he is better left alone.

Before concluding, the ayah as usual warns of the only sanction behind all the ahkaamaat (directives) of our Deity viz. “wat takul lah”  usually translated as “ and fear Allah”. This is the literal meaning of the Arabic words but does not seem to fully encompass the Quranic concept and image of our Lord Creator. I prefer some of the other translations offered: “And be pious to Allah” (Dr. Ghali), “And keep your duty to Allah” (Pickthall) and “be careful of (your duty to) Allah” (Shakir). God consciousness seems to be the best rendering of the Arabic word taqwaa. If one is alive to  and aware of HIS PRESENCE, all the ahkaamaat of the Quran get the first and foremost priority at every breadth one takes. However forget this FUNDAMENTAL REALITY and they — the  ahkaamaat - are reduced to mere recorded words in the Quran. 

The ayah concludes with the oft-repeated reassurance through out the Holy Text to the sin-prone humanity that Allah Ta’aala Subhanahoo quickly Accepts Repentance and is Ever-Merciful. This indeed is the main hope for our salvation at the Final Reckoning.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

........and Allah knows best. May Allah Ta’aala bless us with true understanding--“fahm”--of our Deen, Aameen.



FOOTNOTES

(1) Surah 2/269
يُؤتِي الحِكمَةَ مَن يَشاءُ ۚ وَمَن يُؤتَ الحِكمَةَ فَقَد أوتِيَ خَيرًا كَثيرًا ۗ وَما يَذَّكَّرُ إِلّا أُولُو الأَلبابِ


(2) Surah 102/8
ثُمَّ لَتُسأَلُنَّ يَومَئِذٍ عَنِ النَّعيمِ

(3) Surah 24/12
لَولا إِذ سَمِعتُموهُ ظَنَّ المُؤمِنونَ وَالمُؤمِناتُ بِأَنفُسِهِم خَيرًا وَقالوا هٰذا إِفكٌ مُبينٌ